LEGISLATIVE AND TECHNICAL AFFAIRS
Federal Trade Commission Report Criticizes Anti-Competitive Repair Restrictions
By Stuart Gosswein
warranty or deny coverage due to the mere presence of an
aftermarket replacement or specialty part, or because a repair or
part installation has been performed by an independent shop
(unless the original manufacturer provides the service or part for
free). Photo courtesy: Shutterstock
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a report to Congress in May that is highly critical of anti-competitive repair restrictions employed by manufacturers that limit consumer choice.
While the report focuses on product service and repair issues, it also has ramifications for the specialty parts industry. At stake is the consumer’s right to have a vehicle serviced, repaired—and modified.
In July 2019, the FTC held a “Nixing the Fix” workshop that formed the basis for the report on repair restrictions. The FTC considered a wide array of products ranging from printers to computers, with a focus on automobiles and mobile phones.
Consumer products are becoming harder to fix, and repairs often require specialized tools, difficult-to-obtain parts, and access to proprietary diagnostic software, according to the FTC. Repair options decrease as a result, placing an increased financial burden on lower-income and underserved populations.
The FTC said that there was “scant evidence to support manufacturers’ justifications for repair restrictions.” Manufacturer explanations for the restrictions were divided into six categories: protection of intellectual property, safety, cybersecurity, liability and reputational harm, consumer design choices, and quality of service.
report to Congress in May that identified industry
self-regulation as potentially beneficial while noting
that only the auto industry has created and
implemented it.
The report provided examples of how manufacturer restrictions can block repairs. For example, the FTC reviewed access control technologies employed by OEMs, such as software locks, digital rights management tools, and technological protection measures. While manufacturers argue that those measures are necessary to protect proprietary hardware and copyrighted technologies, repair advocates argue that such tactics lock out independent service providers and consumers from basic repairs.
The report considered the potential for manufacturers to engage in unfair repair restrictions to limit aftermarket competition. Under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA), it is illegal for a manufacturer to void a warranty or deny coverage if a customer has a repair or maintenance performed by an independent repair shop or using a third-party replacement part (unless the original manufacturer provides the service or part for free).
The MMWA’s anti-tying provision is not limited to service and repair issues. It also applies to specialty parts and modifications. For example, SEMA noted in testimony submitted to the FTC’s 2019 workshop that it periodically receives complaints of auto dealerships voiding warranties if the dealership finds a specialty part (e.g., custom wheels) had been installed on the automobile, regardless of whether the specialty part caused the automobile to malfunction.
While the FTC said that the manufacturer or dealer must show that the aftermarket part caused the need for repairs before denying warranty coverage, SEMA recommended that the agency go one step further and require a written explanation.
The FTC expressed concern over whether the MMWA’s anti-tying provision is keeping pace with technological challenges that have the potential effect of tying a repair to the OEM or their authorized dealers using OEM parts. Examples provided include:
- Unavailability of parts and repair information.
- Designs that make independent repairs less safe.
- Policies or statements that steer consumers to manufacturer repair networks.
- Application of patent rights and enforcement of trademarks.
- Disparagement of non-OEM parts and independent repair.
- Software locks and firmware updates.
- End-user license agreements.
The report explored ways to expand consumer repair options. Using the MMWA as a tool, the FTC could revisit whether manufacturers are in compliance and consider whether some repair restrictions are violations of antitrust law. The FTC could update its written guidance and regulations on the topic, although the agency acknowledges that the pursuit would be challenging given the variety of repair restrictions and widespread applicability to multiple industries.
The report also identified industry self-regulation as potentially beneficial while noting that only the auto industry has created and implemented it. In 2014, trade groups representing the automakers and independent repair shops and aftermarket replacement parts manufacturers entered into a Memorandum of Understanding after Massachusetts passed a motor vehicle right-to-repair law. Manufacturers agreed to sell the diagnostic and repair information made available to their dealers to car owners and independent repair shops.
conditions stated in the warranty that may result in its being
voided. Photo courtesy: Shutterstock
In 2020, Massachusetts voters approved a new ballot initiative to essentially expand the existing right-to-repair law to telematics. Starting with model year 2022, “manufacturers of motor vehicles sold in Massachusetts to equip any such vehicles that use telematics systems…with a standardized open access data platform” that would enable vehicle owners to authorize independent repair facilities and dealerships “to retrieve mechanical data from and send commands to the vehicle for repair maintenance and diagnostic testing.” The ballot initiative is currently subject to a court lawsuit.
The report also examined legislative approaches for expanding repair options. Several state laws were cited that require manufacturers to make available adequate service information and replacement parts to warranty stations and independent service facilities for a certain period of time. The European Union is beginning to take up the issue as well, recently adopting some regulations aimed at increasing consumer repair options in the home appliance industry (refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers, etc.).
The FTC concluded that it will pursue appropriate law enforcement and regulatory options to address unfair repair restrictions as well as consumer education. The FTC also stands ready to work with legislators, either at the state or federal level, to protect consumers’ rights and choices in repairing products that they own.
Vehicle Modifications
While the FTC report is generally focused on service and repair issues, consumers also have the right to modify their vehicles without fearing warranty coverage denial based on the installation of a specialty auto part.
Federal warranty laws prevent vehicle manufacturers, dealers and others from unjustly denying warranty coverage. Regarding aftermarket parts, the spirit of the law is that warranty coverage cannot be denied simply because such parts—replacement or specialty—are present on the vehicle or have been used. The warranty coverage can be denied only if the aftermarket part caused a malfunction or damage for which warranty coverage is sought. If disputes arise, they are generally over facts and technical opinions rather than interpretations of the law.
Federal Warranty Laws
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2302(c)): This federal law regulates consumer warranties. The essence of the law concerning aftermarket auto parts is that a vehicle manufacturer may not condition a written or implied warranty on the consumers using parts or services that are identified by brand, trade or corporate name (such as the vehicle maker’s brand) unless the parts or service are provided free of charge.
The law means that the use of an aftermarket part alone is not cause for denying the warranty. However, the law’s protection does not extend to aftermarket parts in situations where such parts actually caused the damage being claimed under the warranty. Further, consumers are advised to be aware of any specific terms or conditions stated in the warranty that may result in its being voided. The law states in relevant part:
“No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumers using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade or corporate name….”
Clean Air Act Warranty Provisions (42 U.S.C. S 7541(c)(3)(B))
The federal Clean Air Act requires vehicle makers to provide two emissions-related warranties: a production warranty and a performance warranty.
The production warranty requires the vehicle maker to warrant that the vehicle is designed, built and equipped so that it conforms to emissions requirements at the time of sale.
The performance warranty requires the vehicle maker to warrant that the vehicle will comply with applicable emissions requirements as tested under state vehicle emissions inspection programs for the specified warranty periods. The performance warranty is conditioned on the vehicle being properly maintained and operated.
As with the MMWA, vehicle manufacturers may not refuse warranty repairs under the Clean Air Act’s performance and defect warranties merely because aftermarket parts have been installed on the vehicle. The only circumstance under which the vehicle manufacturer can void the emissions warranties is if an aftermarket part causes the warranty claim.
Manufacturer warnings to their dealers are another way in which consumer choice may be limited. For example, the automakers periodically issue warnings that put dealers on notice that the use of non-
authorized parts or non-authorized vehicle modifications may void the manufacturer’s warranty obligation and create liability exposure for the dealer.
While most of the warnings do not cross the line of violating the MMWA’s prohibition of tying sales of branded products and services as a condition of warranty coverage, the FTC has flagged several warnings in recent years. In those cases, the agency placed the automaker on notice that it must change the warnings or face FTC legal action.
Technology is ever-evolving. Whether it is addressing cybersecurity concerns or controlling data, SEMA is working with its industry partners to make sure consumers always have the right to modify their vehicles and enjoy their rides.
For more information, visit www.semasan.com/resources/warranty-issues.
Because the SEMA Show is a trade-only event, John Mata Jr. felt that it was his duty to filter through the many new products at the SEMA Show and highlight the ones that would appeal to his readers. His final report included descriptions and photos of more than 40 new parts for 2020.








4 Wheel Parts announced the promotion of Kathryn Reinhardt to director of retail marketing. Reinhardt brings more than 15 years of experience in the automotive aftermarket industry. In her new role, she will lead the go-to-marketing strategy, planning and execution of the 4 Wheel Parts retail and house brands marketing. Reinhardt also currently serves on SEMA’s Board of Directors, is the immediate past chair of the Truck & Off Road Alliance and is the current chair of SEMA Cares.
Caliber, parent company to Caliber Collision, Caliber Auto Glass and Caliber Auto Care, announced that Roland Smith joined its board of directors effective April 19. Smith brings more than 30 years of experience in consumer brands and multi-unit operations spanning the hospitality, entertainment, supermarket and office product industries. As a member of Caliber’s board, Smith will provide strategic guidance to support Caliber’s operations, teammates, partners and customers.
ZEV announced the addition of Rick Kreifeldt to its advisory board. Kreifeldt has more than 30 years of technology experience. He serves as the head of American R&D for LG Electronics, where his team specializes in artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, user experience and next-generation automotive platforms. His responsibilities include advanced technology development, new-business incubation, and open innovation. Previously, Kreifeldt was president of Motoforza Inc., a strategy and technology consultancy.
Randys Worldwide announced the promotion of Neal Hollingsworth to vice president of marketing. Reporting to the president and CEO, Hollingsworth will continue to be responsible for activities related to Randys Worldwide and the network of brands across all sales and marketing channels. Hollingsworth’s marketing group leads Randys’ companies in web, analytics, digital, event and brand management, graphic design, motion graphics, sales channel support and development, and customer marketing support.
Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. announced that John Thomas was selected as its next president and CEO. Thomas brings more than 30 years of automotive experience to the role, including extensive knowledge of the North American OEM and aftermarket landscape. In his most recent role, Thomas served as president and CEO of Webasto Charging Systems in Monrovia, California. Thomas will report to Tatsuo Mitsuhata, chairman of the board of Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp.
Retrac Group announced that experienced automotive and motorsports executive Dan Walmsley was appointed CEO. He will lead the group’s two divisions: Retrac Productions Ltd. and Retrac Composites Ltd. Longstanding co-owner and Retrac Productions Managing Director Andy Carter was appointed chairman of Retrac Group. Walmsley arrives at the company from VentilatorChallengeUK Consortium. Prior, he was the motorsports director at McLaren Automotive from 2016 to 2020, having been team principal at FIA World Sportscar Championship entrant Strakka Racing.
Pylon Manufacturing announced the appointment of Michael Fretwell as president. He brings more than two decades of experience in sales, marketing and product development. He previously served as chief marketing officer at Pylon, where he drove the expansion of retailers and led the company’s launch of several new innovative products and initiatives, including the first-ever BFGoodrich Off Road Wiper Blades and the industry’s first real-time fitment solution.
Mark Lieber joined the team at Maxxsonics USA as project and quality manager. His responsibilities will involve leading the company’s concurrent product development teams in the design and engineering of products. Lieber began his career in 1987 and worked at various positions at Rockford Fosgate, YSI Inc. and Scosche Industries before joining the Maxxsonics team.
Mickey Thompson Tires & Wheels named Jason Moulton director of motorsports. With 23 years of experience in race tire development for the company, Moulton developed several new drag-race tires, wheels and related products, such as Mickey Thompson’s big drag tire program, including the first “Bubba” ET Drag tire for Top Sportsman, Top Dragster, Super Comp and more classes. Moulton will oversee a team of motorsports experts and will attend more than 100 race events each year, providing trackside service to racers at national, divisional and local events across the country.