LEGISLATIVE AND TECHNICAL AFFAIRS
The Battle to Save Oceano Dunes
The State Vehicular Recreation Area is California’s Only Pacific Ocean OHV Park
By Stuart Gosswein
For decades, off-roaders have been able to enjoy riding their vehicles on a California beach and up and down massive sand dunes. That thrill may soon vanish. In March, the California Coastal Commission voted unanimously to abolish off-highway vehicle (OHV) access to California’s Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area (SVRA) within three years. In response, SEMA, along with three other OHV-related organizations, challenged the commission in court.
Oceano Dunes SVRA is a unique resource for the off-road community. It is the state’s only OHV park on the Pacific Ocean. Located about two hours northwest of Los Angeles near San Luis Obispo, it became a state park in 1974, originally encompassing 3,600 acres but now less than 1,500 acres. It adjoins Pismo State Beach, which provides a chance to beach camp, surf, swim, fish and bird watch.
Oceano Dunes is a major attraction that draws enthusiasts and tourists from across the nation who are eager to ride four-wheel drives, motorcycles, ATVs, Sun Buggies, high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV) and UTVs in the park. The activity generates millions of dollars for the local economy—money spent at area stores, motels, restaurants, gas stations, etc. Beyond financial considerations, the joy of motorized recreation at the dunes has been cherished by individuals, friends and families for generations. Its days may be numbered.
Oceano Dunes SVRA has been under threat of closure for many years, primarily by groups that object to motorized recreation on the 8-mi. strip of land. Opposition is largely based on environmental arguments—airborne particulate matter (dust) and/or threatened plants and animals. For years, SEMA has joined with many other OHV groups in challenging the scientific basis for the claims, citing the importance of the area for the enthusiast community and the local economy.
Two state agencies have been locked in a conflicting jurisdictional dispute over the land: the California Coastal Commission and California State Parks. The commission contends that it has primacy with respect to environmental concerns, while State Parks cites a mandate from the state legislature to manage the area for OHV use.
In 1982, the commission issued a Coastal Development Permit to State Parks for the construction of entrance kiosks and fencing. Over subsequent decades, the permit was amended so that State Parks could better protect the site’s natural resources. Changes included reduced acreage for RV camping and OHV riding. The permit was deemed to cover “development,” a designation that the commission has used as a threat for withdrawing the permit over OHV use.
Around 2017, the commission recommended that State Parks prepare a Public Works Plan (PWP) to pursue a new management plan for the area. Between 2017 and December 2020, State Parks developed a draft PWP and an accompanying Environmental Impact Report. However, the commission was discontented over the length of time to prepare the PWP and State Parks’ intention to still allow OHV activity.
In July 2019, the commission considered withdrawing the State Parks permit. SEMA joined with the enthusiast community in successfully opposing the proposal. The commission authorized State Parks to continue pursuing a new management plan for the area. In February 2021, the commission voiced impatience and displeasure that State Parks still intended to allow OHV activity on the land, albeit within a reduced space. On March 18, 2021, the commission unanimously voted to shut down OHV access within three years.
The commission’s unilateral action came at a time when State Parks was holding a public comment period on its draft PWP. State Parks is still reviewing the comments and also evaluating how to respond to the commission’s action.
The State Parks’ PWP is not perfect. SEMA joined with 16 other businesses, associations and enthusiast groups in opposing several proposed provisions, such as ending OHV/ATV rental concessions and reducing the OHV day-use limit from 1,720 vehicles per day to 1,000. But it does protect OHV access, and a final PWP can address some of the current shortcomings.
As noted, SEMA filed a lawsuit to challenge the commission’s action. SEMA joined with Ecologic Partners, a legal partnership between the Off-Road Business Association, the American Sand Association, and the American Motorcyclist Association District 37. The lawsuit was filed in California Superior Court for San Luis Obispo County. It is unclear when the court will take up the case or if the state will seek to intervene in a dispute between two agencies.
SEMA will continue to be a vocal advocate for protecting Oceano Dunes SVRA. It will work closely with industry, other organizations and the enthusiast community in that effort.