SEMA News - May 2010

SEMA Goverment Affairs

	SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of classic vehicles.

Officials across the country are constantly working on legislative and regulatory proposals that have a direct impact on our industry and your customers. The SEMA government affairs office advocates in support of pro-industry initiatives and, when needed, opposes unfair or restrictive legislation. Here are just a few of the issues facing each of the market segments within our industry. 

Off-Road

In spite of mass opposition from enthusiast and industry groups, areas designed for motorized recreation are under threat of being closed to off-highway vehicles by a slew of new wilderness bills that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. This is extremely consequential to SEMA members, as these types of regulations potentially deny access to off-roaders who purchase specialty equipment to enhance the off-road utility of their vehicles.

SEMA has urged decision makers to actively solicit the participation of enthusiasts groups in developing these policies.
SEMA has also advocated that regulators in Washington, D.C., do not adopt one-size-fits-all guidelines for motorized recreation. Instead, SEMA promotes a policy that would require the federal government to work with local officials and end users to adopt reasonable and responsible motorized vehicle access while maintaining the overall environmental health of the recreation area.

Restoration

The mother of all vehicle scrappage plans was implemented last year in the form of the U.S. government’s Car Allowance Rebate System, better known as “Cash for Clunkers.” When you combine this program with the increasing number of scrappage bills being introduced around the country by state governments, it seems the only place lawmakers would like to see older cars is in the crusher. Fortunately, SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of these classic vehicles.

Crucial to these efforts is educating policymakers to the fact that these vehicles are well maintained, used only on a limited basis and, in many circumstances, emit less pollution than when first produced. SEMA is also working to support this ever-growing market through legislation that provides reduced or one-time registration fees and other proposals that will ease the bureaucratic burden in purchasing and owning these vehicles.

Street Performance

	Some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles.

From street machines to sport compacts, it’s all about performance. However, some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles. These include restrictions to aftermarket exhaust systems, engine-enhancing equipment and performance tires and wheels.

Over the years, SEMA has worked with lawmakers to enact fair and responsible alternatives to these proposals. SEMA created model legislation to establish a 95-decibel exhaust-noise testing standard to counter restrictive attempts on modified exhaust systems. Instead of banning nitrous-oxide systems, SEMA has urged lawmakers to adopt legislation that permits equipped vehicles to be operated on public roads if the supply lines have been disconnected, the canisters have been removed or if the vehicle is en route to or from a racetrack.

Street Rod

In many states, outdated vehicle registration laws have created confusion for those attempting to register street rods and other custom or specialty vehicles. To help simplify this process, SEMA has developed model legislation to create titling and registration classes for street rods and custom vehicles, including kit cars and replicas.

Through this initiative, qualifying vehicles are assigned the same model-year designations as the production vehicles they most closely resemble and are exempted from periodic inspections and emissions tests. The SEMA-model bill has helped to clear the often muddied process of street-rod and custom titling and has provided a fair and reasonable process for states that either don’t have registration classifications for these vehicles or have laws that are lacking in some way. Through the help of hobby-friendly lawmakers, 20 states have adopted laws based on the SEMA model.

Street Truck/SUV

With the current economic situation and fluctuating fuel prices, the last thing consumers want is additional fees for purchasing a vehicle that meets their needs. To mitigate these burdens, SEMA has consistently opposed attempts to penalize consumers for purchasing trucks and SUVs through increased taxes or vehicle surcharges.

While the aftermarket is a birthplace for many of the new technologies that will help automakers achieve higher fuel standards, new laws must provide the necessary time to apply such breakthroughs to mass production and to ensure that there is no unnecessary disruption to the marketplace, businesses and workers. In addition to these issues, SEMA diligently works with pro-industry lawmakers to prevent restrictions on grille guards, lighting equipment and other truck accessories. SEMA has also rallied against legislative proposals that would unfairly prohibit reasonable modifications to suspension equipment on trucks and SUVs.  

 

 

 

SEMA News - May 2010

SEMA Goverment Affairs

	SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of classic vehicles.

Officials across the country are constantly working on legislative and regulatory proposals that have a direct impact on our industry and your customers. The SEMA government affairs office advocates in support of pro-industry initiatives and, when needed, opposes unfair or restrictive legislation. Here are just a few of the issues facing each of the market segments within our industry. 

Off-Road

In spite of mass opposition from enthusiast and industry groups, areas designed for motorized recreation are under threat of being closed to off-highway vehicles by a slew of new wilderness bills that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. This is extremely consequential to SEMA members, as these types of regulations potentially deny access to off-roaders who purchase specialty equipment to enhance the off-road utility of their vehicles.

SEMA has urged decision makers to actively solicit the participation of enthusiasts groups in developing these policies.
SEMA has also advocated that regulators in Washington, D.C., do not adopt one-size-fits-all guidelines for motorized recreation. Instead, SEMA promotes a policy that would require the federal government to work with local officials and end users to adopt reasonable and responsible motorized vehicle access while maintaining the overall environmental health of the recreation area.

Restoration

The mother of all vehicle scrappage plans was implemented last year in the form of the U.S. government’s Car Allowance Rebate System, better known as “Cash for Clunkers.” When you combine this program with the increasing number of scrappage bills being introduced around the country by state governments, it seems the only place lawmakers would like to see older cars is in the crusher. Fortunately, SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of these classic vehicles.

Crucial to these efforts is educating policymakers to the fact that these vehicles are well maintained, used only on a limited basis and, in many circumstances, emit less pollution than when first produced. SEMA is also working to support this ever-growing market through legislation that provides reduced or one-time registration fees and other proposals that will ease the bureaucratic burden in purchasing and owning these vehicles.

Street Performance

	Some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles.

From street machines to sport compacts, it’s all about performance. However, some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles. These include restrictions to aftermarket exhaust systems, engine-enhancing equipment and performance tires and wheels.

Over the years, SEMA has worked with lawmakers to enact fair and responsible alternatives to these proposals. SEMA created model legislation to establish a 95-decibel exhaust-noise testing standard to counter restrictive attempts on modified exhaust systems. Instead of banning nitrous-oxide systems, SEMA has urged lawmakers to adopt legislation that permits equipped vehicles to be operated on public roads if the supply lines have been disconnected, the canisters have been removed or if the vehicle is en route to or from a racetrack.

Street Rod

In many states, outdated vehicle registration laws have created confusion for those attempting to register street rods and other custom or specialty vehicles. To help simplify this process, SEMA has developed model legislation to create titling and registration classes for street rods and custom vehicles, including kit cars and replicas.

Through this initiative, qualifying vehicles are assigned the same model-year designations as the production vehicles they most closely resemble and are exempted from periodic inspections and emissions tests. The SEMA-model bill has helped to clear the often muddied process of street-rod and custom titling and has provided a fair and reasonable process for states that either don’t have registration classifications for these vehicles or have laws that are lacking in some way. Through the help of hobby-friendly lawmakers, 20 states have adopted laws based on the SEMA model.

Street Truck/SUV

With the current economic situation and fluctuating fuel prices, the last thing consumers want is additional fees for purchasing a vehicle that meets their needs. To mitigate these burdens, SEMA has consistently opposed attempts to penalize consumers for purchasing trucks and SUVs through increased taxes or vehicle surcharges.

While the aftermarket is a birthplace for many of the new technologies that will help automakers achieve higher fuel standards, new laws must provide the necessary time to apply such breakthroughs to mass production and to ensure that there is no unnecessary disruption to the marketplace, businesses and workers. In addition to these issues, SEMA diligently works with pro-industry lawmakers to prevent restrictions on grille guards, lighting equipment and other truck accessories. SEMA has also rallied against legislative proposals that would unfairly prohibit reasonable modifications to suspension equipment on trucks and SUVs.  

 

 

 

SEMA News - May 2010

SEMA Goverment Affairs

	SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of classic vehicles.

Officials across the country are constantly working on legislative and regulatory proposals that have a direct impact on our industry and your customers. The SEMA government affairs office advocates in support of pro-industry initiatives and, when needed, opposes unfair or restrictive legislation. Here are just a few of the issues facing each of the market segments within our industry. 

Off-Road

In spite of mass opposition from enthusiast and industry groups, areas designed for motorized recreation are under threat of being closed to off-highway vehicles by a slew of new wilderness bills that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. This is extremely consequential to SEMA members, as these types of regulations potentially deny access to off-roaders who purchase specialty equipment to enhance the off-road utility of their vehicles.

SEMA has urged decision makers to actively solicit the participation of enthusiasts groups in developing these policies.
SEMA has also advocated that regulators in Washington, D.C., do not adopt one-size-fits-all guidelines for motorized recreation. Instead, SEMA promotes a policy that would require the federal government to work with local officials and end users to adopt reasonable and responsible motorized vehicle access while maintaining the overall environmental health of the recreation area.

Restoration

The mother of all vehicle scrappage plans was implemented last year in the form of the U.S. government’s Car Allowance Rebate System, better known as “Cash for Clunkers.” When you combine this program with the increasing number of scrappage bills being introduced around the country by state governments, it seems the only place lawmakers would like to see older cars is in the crusher. Fortunately, SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of these classic vehicles.

Crucial to these efforts is educating policymakers to the fact that these vehicles are well maintained, used only on a limited basis and, in many circumstances, emit less pollution than when first produced. SEMA is also working to support this ever-growing market through legislation that provides reduced or one-time registration fees and other proposals that will ease the bureaucratic burden in purchasing and owning these vehicles.

Street Performance

	Some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles.

From street machines to sport compacts, it’s all about performance. However, some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles. These include restrictions to aftermarket exhaust systems, engine-enhancing equipment and performance tires and wheels.

Over the years, SEMA has worked with lawmakers to enact fair and responsible alternatives to these proposals. SEMA created model legislation to establish a 95-decibel exhaust-noise testing standard to counter restrictive attempts on modified exhaust systems. Instead of banning nitrous-oxide systems, SEMA has urged lawmakers to adopt legislation that permits equipped vehicles to be operated on public roads if the supply lines have been disconnected, the canisters have been removed or if the vehicle is en route to or from a racetrack.

Street Rod

In many states, outdated vehicle registration laws have created confusion for those attempting to register street rods and other custom or specialty vehicles. To help simplify this process, SEMA has developed model legislation to create titling and registration classes for street rods and custom vehicles, including kit cars and replicas.

Through this initiative, qualifying vehicles are assigned the same model-year designations as the production vehicles they most closely resemble and are exempted from periodic inspections and emissions tests. The SEMA-model bill has helped to clear the often muddied process of street-rod and custom titling and has provided a fair and reasonable process for states that either don’t have registration classifications for these vehicles or have laws that are lacking in some way. Through the help of hobby-friendly lawmakers, 20 states have adopted laws based on the SEMA model.

Street Truck/SUV

With the current economic situation and fluctuating fuel prices, the last thing consumers want is additional fees for purchasing a vehicle that meets their needs. To mitigate these burdens, SEMA has consistently opposed attempts to penalize consumers for purchasing trucks and SUVs through increased taxes or vehicle surcharges.

While the aftermarket is a birthplace for many of the new technologies that will help automakers achieve higher fuel standards, new laws must provide the necessary time to apply such breakthroughs to mass production and to ensure that there is no unnecessary disruption to the marketplace, businesses and workers. In addition to these issues, SEMA diligently works with pro-industry lawmakers to prevent restrictions on grille guards, lighting equipment and other truck accessories. SEMA has also rallied against legislative proposals that would unfairly prohibit reasonable modifications to suspension equipment on trucks and SUVs.  

 

 

 

SEMA News - May 2010

SEMA Goverment Affairs

	SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of classic vehicles.

Officials across the country are constantly working on legislative and regulatory proposals that have a direct impact on our industry and your customers. The SEMA government affairs office advocates in support of pro-industry initiatives and, when needed, opposes unfair or restrictive legislation. Here are just a few of the issues facing each of the market segments within our industry. 

Off-Road

In spite of mass opposition from enthusiast and industry groups, areas designed for motorized recreation are under threat of being closed to off-highway vehicles by a slew of new wilderness bills that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. This is extremely consequential to SEMA members, as these types of regulations potentially deny access to off-roaders who purchase specialty equipment to enhance the off-road utility of their vehicles.

SEMA has urged decision makers to actively solicit the participation of enthusiasts groups in developing these policies.
SEMA has also advocated that regulators in Washington, D.C., do not adopt one-size-fits-all guidelines for motorized recreation. Instead, SEMA promotes a policy that would require the federal government to work with local officials and end users to adopt reasonable and responsible motorized vehicle access while maintaining the overall environmental health of the recreation area.

Restoration

The mother of all vehicle scrappage plans was implemented last year in the form of the U.S. government’s Car Allowance Rebate System, better known as “Cash for Clunkers.” When you combine this program with the increasing number of scrappage bills being introduced around the country by state governments, it seems the only place lawmakers would like to see older cars is in the crusher. Fortunately, SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of these classic vehicles.

Crucial to these efforts is educating policymakers to the fact that these vehicles are well maintained, used only on a limited basis and, in many circumstances, emit less pollution than when first produced. SEMA is also working to support this ever-growing market through legislation that provides reduced or one-time registration fees and other proposals that will ease the bureaucratic burden in purchasing and owning these vehicles.

Street Performance

	Some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles.

From street machines to sport compacts, it’s all about performance. However, some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles. These include restrictions to aftermarket exhaust systems, engine-enhancing equipment and performance tires and wheels.

Over the years, SEMA has worked with lawmakers to enact fair and responsible alternatives to these proposals. SEMA created model legislation to establish a 95-decibel exhaust-noise testing standard to counter restrictive attempts on modified exhaust systems. Instead of banning nitrous-oxide systems, SEMA has urged lawmakers to adopt legislation that permits equipped vehicles to be operated on public roads if the supply lines have been disconnected, the canisters have been removed or if the vehicle is en route to or from a racetrack.

Street Rod

In many states, outdated vehicle registration laws have created confusion for those attempting to register street rods and other custom or specialty vehicles. To help simplify this process, SEMA has developed model legislation to create titling and registration classes for street rods and custom vehicles, including kit cars and replicas.

Through this initiative, qualifying vehicles are assigned the same model-year designations as the production vehicles they most closely resemble and are exempted from periodic inspections and emissions tests. The SEMA-model bill has helped to clear the often muddied process of street-rod and custom titling and has provided a fair and reasonable process for states that either don’t have registration classifications for these vehicles or have laws that are lacking in some way. Through the help of hobby-friendly lawmakers, 20 states have adopted laws based on the SEMA model.

Street Truck/SUV

With the current economic situation and fluctuating fuel prices, the last thing consumers want is additional fees for purchasing a vehicle that meets their needs. To mitigate these burdens, SEMA has consistently opposed attempts to penalize consumers for purchasing trucks and SUVs through increased taxes or vehicle surcharges.

While the aftermarket is a birthplace for many of the new technologies that will help automakers achieve higher fuel standards, new laws must provide the necessary time to apply such breakthroughs to mass production and to ensure that there is no unnecessary disruption to the marketplace, businesses and workers. In addition to these issues, SEMA diligently works with pro-industry lawmakers to prevent restrictions on grille guards, lighting equipment and other truck accessories. SEMA has also rallied against legislative proposals that would unfairly prohibit reasonable modifications to suspension equipment on trucks and SUVs.  

 

 

 

SEMA News - May 2010

SEMA Goverment Affairs

	SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of classic vehicles.

Officials across the country are constantly working on legislative and regulatory proposals that have a direct impact on our industry and your customers. The SEMA government affairs office advocates in support of pro-industry initiatives and, when needed, opposes unfair or restrictive legislation. Here are just a few of the issues facing each of the market segments within our industry. 

Off-Road

In spite of mass opposition from enthusiast and industry groups, areas designed for motorized recreation are under threat of being closed to off-highway vehicles by a slew of new wilderness bills that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. This is extremely consequential to SEMA members, as these types of regulations potentially deny access to off-roaders who purchase specialty equipment to enhance the off-road utility of their vehicles.

SEMA has urged decision makers to actively solicit the participation of enthusiasts groups in developing these policies.
SEMA has also advocated that regulators in Washington, D.C., do not adopt one-size-fits-all guidelines for motorized recreation. Instead, SEMA promotes a policy that would require the federal government to work with local officials and end users to adopt reasonable and responsible motorized vehicle access while maintaining the overall environmental health of the recreation area.

Restoration

The mother of all vehicle scrappage plans was implemented last year in the form of the U.S. government’s Car Allowance Rebate System, better known as “Cash for Clunkers.” When you combine this program with the increasing number of scrappage bills being introduced around the country by state governments, it seems the only place lawmakers would like to see older cars is in the crusher. Fortunately, SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of these classic vehicles.

Crucial to these efforts is educating policymakers to the fact that these vehicles are well maintained, used only on a limited basis and, in many circumstances, emit less pollution than when first produced. SEMA is also working to support this ever-growing market through legislation that provides reduced or one-time registration fees and other proposals that will ease the bureaucratic burden in purchasing and owning these vehicles.

Street Performance

	Some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles.

From street machines to sport compacts, it’s all about performance. However, some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles. These include restrictions to aftermarket exhaust systems, engine-enhancing equipment and performance tires and wheels.

Over the years, SEMA has worked with lawmakers to enact fair and responsible alternatives to these proposals. SEMA created model legislation to establish a 95-decibel exhaust-noise testing standard to counter restrictive attempts on modified exhaust systems. Instead of banning nitrous-oxide systems, SEMA has urged lawmakers to adopt legislation that permits equipped vehicles to be operated on public roads if the supply lines have been disconnected, the canisters have been removed or if the vehicle is en route to or from a racetrack.

Street Rod

In many states, outdated vehicle registration laws have created confusion for those attempting to register street rods and other custom or specialty vehicles. To help simplify this process, SEMA has developed model legislation to create titling and registration classes for street rods and custom vehicles, including kit cars and replicas.

Through this initiative, qualifying vehicles are assigned the same model-year designations as the production vehicles they most closely resemble and are exempted from periodic inspections and emissions tests. The SEMA-model bill has helped to clear the often muddied process of street-rod and custom titling and has provided a fair and reasonable process for states that either don’t have registration classifications for these vehicles or have laws that are lacking in some way. Through the help of hobby-friendly lawmakers, 20 states have adopted laws based on the SEMA model.

Street Truck/SUV

With the current economic situation and fluctuating fuel prices, the last thing consumers want is additional fees for purchasing a vehicle that meets their needs. To mitigate these burdens, SEMA has consistently opposed attempts to penalize consumers for purchasing trucks and SUVs through increased taxes or vehicle surcharges.

While the aftermarket is a birthplace for many of the new technologies that will help automakers achieve higher fuel standards, new laws must provide the necessary time to apply such breakthroughs to mass production and to ensure that there is no unnecessary disruption to the marketplace, businesses and workers. In addition to these issues, SEMA diligently works with pro-industry lawmakers to prevent restrictions on grille guards, lighting equipment and other truck accessories. SEMA has also rallied against legislative proposals that would unfairly prohibit reasonable modifications to suspension equipment on trucks and SUVs.  

 

 

 

SEMA News - May 2010

SEMA Goverment Affairs

	SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of classic vehicles.

Officials across the country are constantly working on legislative and regulatory proposals that have a direct impact on our industry and your customers. The SEMA government affairs office advocates in support of pro-industry initiatives and, when needed, opposes unfair or restrictive legislation. Here are just a few of the issues facing each of the market segments within our industry. 

Off-Road

In spite of mass opposition from enthusiast and industry groups, areas designed for motorized recreation are under threat of being closed to off-highway vehicles by a slew of new wilderness bills that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. This is extremely consequential to SEMA members, as these types of regulations potentially deny access to off-roaders who purchase specialty equipment to enhance the off-road utility of their vehicles.

SEMA has urged decision makers to actively solicit the participation of enthusiasts groups in developing these policies.
SEMA has also advocated that regulators in Washington, D.C., do not adopt one-size-fits-all guidelines for motorized recreation. Instead, SEMA promotes a policy that would require the federal government to work with local officials and end users to adopt reasonable and responsible motorized vehicle access while maintaining the overall environmental health of the recreation area.

Restoration

The mother of all vehicle scrappage plans was implemented last year in the form of the U.S. government’s Car Allowance Rebate System, better known as “Cash for Clunkers.” When you combine this program with the increasing number of scrappage bills being introduced around the country by state governments, it seems the only place lawmakers would like to see older cars is in the crusher. Fortunately, SEMA has identified and is working with a growing number of pro-industry lawmakers who recognize the irreplaceable value of these classic vehicles.

Crucial to these efforts is educating policymakers to the fact that these vehicles are well maintained, used only on a limited basis and, in many circumstances, emit less pollution than when first produced. SEMA is also working to support this ever-growing market through legislation that provides reduced or one-time registration fees and other proposals that will ease the bureaucratic burden in purchasing and owning these vehicles.

Street Performance

	Some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles.

From street machines to sport compacts, it’s all about performance. However, some officials have tried to limit the types of modifications that can be made to these vehicles. These include restrictions to aftermarket exhaust systems, engine-enhancing equipment and performance tires and wheels.

Over the years, SEMA has worked with lawmakers to enact fair and responsible alternatives to these proposals. SEMA created model legislation to establish a 95-decibel exhaust-noise testing standard to counter restrictive attempts on modified exhaust systems. Instead of banning nitrous-oxide systems, SEMA has urged lawmakers to adopt legislation that permits equipped vehicles to be operated on public roads if the supply lines have been disconnected, the canisters have been removed or if the vehicle is en route to or from a racetrack.

Street Rod

In many states, outdated vehicle registration laws have created confusion for those attempting to register street rods and other custom or specialty vehicles. To help simplify this process, SEMA has developed model legislation to create titling and registration classes for street rods and custom vehicles, including kit cars and replicas.

Through this initiative, qualifying vehicles are assigned the same model-year designations as the production vehicles they most closely resemble and are exempted from periodic inspections and emissions tests. The SEMA-model bill has helped to clear the often muddied process of street-rod and custom titling and has provided a fair and reasonable process for states that either don’t have registration classifications for these vehicles or have laws that are lacking in some way. Through the help of hobby-friendly lawmakers, 20 states have adopted laws based on the SEMA model.

Street Truck/SUV

With the current economic situation and fluctuating fuel prices, the last thing consumers want is additional fees for purchasing a vehicle that meets their needs. To mitigate these burdens, SEMA has consistently opposed attempts to penalize consumers for purchasing trucks and SUVs through increased taxes or vehicle surcharges.

While the aftermarket is a birthplace for many of the new technologies that will help automakers achieve higher fuel standards, new laws must provide the necessary time to apply such breakthroughs to mass production and to ensure that there is no unnecessary disruption to the marketplace, businesses and workers. In addition to these issues, SEMA diligently works with pro-industry lawmakers to prevent restrictions on grille guards, lighting equipment and other truck accessories. SEMA has also rallied against legislative proposals that would unfairly prohibit reasonable modifications to suspension equipment on trucks and SUVs.  

 

 

 

SEMA News - May 2010

By Dan Sadowski

Contentious Election Year Leads to Uncertain Political Landscape

The 2010 mid-term elections are around the corner, and at no time in recent history has Washington been so divided. While 2008 represented an election of “change,” aspirations of bipartisan cooperation quickly evaporated in 2009. Lawmakers could not agree on how to stimulate the economy before becoming mired in the debate to reform the American health care system. 

Town halls were held. Press conferences staged. Speeches delivered to Congress and the American people. Even a televised, bipartisan summit was arranged. Yet, as the health care debate continued, the American political landscape was as divided as ever—leading many to question whether change was even possible. 

The health care debate illustrates the problem. It is an issue that elicits strong opinions. On this topic, the two parties have fundamental differences in approach that seem impossible to bridge. The Democrats are focused on enrolling all Americans into a system that will include heavy financial obligations, while the Republicans want an incremental approach to drive down costs and preserve the private marketplace but not guarantee universal coverage. Result: gridlock and unilateral actions—the opposite of bipartisanship and compromise. The debate has also produced voter anger, a recipe for the formation of third parties.

This is not the first time exasperated voters have looked beyond the two-party system. Recent alternatives have included Ross Perot, John Anderson and, looking back a bit farther, Huey Long and Teddy Roosevelt. They bear different labels—the Reform Party, Populists and Progressives and, most recently, Tea Party. 

When President Obama was inaugurated just over one year ago, the American people were optimistic for a promised new era of cooperation in Washington. Expectations were high yet naive and perhaps unrealistic. Missteps and partisan animosity quickly defeated the goal. Frankly, not all of the politicians had agreed on the premise of compromise. Other politicians had painted themselves into a corner with their constituents, unable to reach across the aisle after lambasting the other party during the election cycle.

The current voter discontent has translated into a loud demand for a different kind of change. Invigorated citizen groups, such as the Tea Party organization, are leading the cause to “throw the bums out.” The renewed anti-incumbent mentality is driven by a dysfunctional Congress that can’t pass meaningful legislation. In an effort to be heard, will voters sacrifice party loyalty and vote for new, anti-establishment candidates?

The recent election in Massachusetts and the Republican primary in Texas have put all elected officials on notice that the “sleeping giant” of the electorate has awoken. The anti-Washington sentiment raised by the voters in Massachusetts was validated in Texas. Given the results, change continues to evolve in American politics, and tangible change may be coming to Washington sooner rather than later.

But there is a dilemma. Voters are also responsible for the dysfunctional Congress they elect. In recent years, they have driven out the centrists and elected more and more politicians who are ideological in their views, whether on the right or the left. “Compromise” has become a four-letter word. The challenge becomes how to elect lawmakers who will truly represent the will of their constituents when they get to Washington, D.C.

No sitting member of Congress is safe from voter unrest. While the results of this year’s elections are uncertain, the majority of incumbent elected officials are concerned about their futures, and rightfully so. Will voter discontent lead to a greater sense of political cooperation, or will the electorate achieve the unintended: more political gridlock?  

SEMA News - May 2010

By Dan Sadowski

Contentious Election Year Leads to Uncertain Political Landscape

The 2010 mid-term elections are around the corner, and at no time in recent history has Washington been so divided. While 2008 represented an election of “change,” aspirations of bipartisan cooperation quickly evaporated in 2009. Lawmakers could not agree on how to stimulate the economy before becoming mired in the debate to reform the American health care system. 

Town halls were held. Press conferences staged. Speeches delivered to Congress and the American people. Even a televised, bipartisan summit was arranged. Yet, as the health care debate continued, the American political landscape was as divided as ever—leading many to question whether change was even possible. 

The health care debate illustrates the problem. It is an issue that elicits strong opinions. On this topic, the two parties have fundamental differences in approach that seem impossible to bridge. The Democrats are focused on enrolling all Americans into a system that will include heavy financial obligations, while the Republicans want an incremental approach to drive down costs and preserve the private marketplace but not guarantee universal coverage. Result: gridlock and unilateral actions—the opposite of bipartisanship and compromise. The debate has also produced voter anger, a recipe for the formation of third parties.

This is not the first time exasperated voters have looked beyond the two-party system. Recent alternatives have included Ross Perot, John Anderson and, looking back a bit farther, Huey Long and Teddy Roosevelt. They bear different labels—the Reform Party, Populists and Progressives and, most recently, Tea Party. 

When President Obama was inaugurated just over one year ago, the American people were optimistic for a promised new era of cooperation in Washington. Expectations were high yet naive and perhaps unrealistic. Missteps and partisan animosity quickly defeated the goal. Frankly, not all of the politicians had agreed on the premise of compromise. Other politicians had painted themselves into a corner with their constituents, unable to reach across the aisle after lambasting the other party during the election cycle.

The current voter discontent has translated into a loud demand for a different kind of change. Invigorated citizen groups, such as the Tea Party organization, are leading the cause to “throw the bums out.” The renewed anti-incumbent mentality is driven by a dysfunctional Congress that can’t pass meaningful legislation. In an effort to be heard, will voters sacrifice party loyalty and vote for new, anti-establishment candidates?

The recent election in Massachusetts and the Republican primary in Texas have put all elected officials on notice that the “sleeping giant” of the electorate has awoken. The anti-Washington sentiment raised by the voters in Massachusetts was validated in Texas. Given the results, change continues to evolve in American politics, and tangible change may be coming to Washington sooner rather than later.

But there is a dilemma. Voters are also responsible for the dysfunctional Congress they elect. In recent years, they have driven out the centrists and elected more and more politicians who are ideological in their views, whether on the right or the left. “Compromise” has become a four-letter word. The challenge becomes how to elect lawmakers who will truly represent the will of their constituents when they get to Washington, D.C.

No sitting member of Congress is safe from voter unrest. While the results of this year’s elections are uncertain, the majority of incumbent elected officials are concerned about their futures, and rightfully so. Will voter discontent lead to a greater sense of political cooperation, or will the electorate achieve the unintended: more political gridlock?  

SEMA News - May 2010

By Dan Sadowski

Contentious Election Year Leads to Uncertain Political Landscape

The 2010 mid-term elections are around the corner, and at no time in recent history has Washington been so divided. While 2008 represented an election of “change,” aspirations of bipartisan cooperation quickly evaporated in 2009. Lawmakers could not agree on how to stimulate the economy before becoming mired in the debate to reform the American health care system. 

Town halls were held. Press conferences staged. Speeches delivered to Congress and the American people. Even a televised, bipartisan summit was arranged. Yet, as the health care debate continued, the American political landscape was as divided as ever—leading many to question whether change was even possible. 

The health care debate illustrates the problem. It is an issue that elicits strong opinions. On this topic, the two parties have fundamental differences in approach that seem impossible to bridge. The Democrats are focused on enrolling all Americans into a system that will include heavy financial obligations, while the Republicans want an incremental approach to drive down costs and preserve the private marketplace but not guarantee universal coverage. Result: gridlock and unilateral actions—the opposite of bipartisanship and compromise. The debate has also produced voter anger, a recipe for the formation of third parties.

This is not the first time exasperated voters have looked beyond the two-party system. Recent alternatives have included Ross Perot, John Anderson and, looking back a bit farther, Huey Long and Teddy Roosevelt. They bear different labels—the Reform Party, Populists and Progressives and, most recently, Tea Party. 

When President Obama was inaugurated just over one year ago, the American people were optimistic for a promised new era of cooperation in Washington. Expectations were high yet naive and perhaps unrealistic. Missteps and partisan animosity quickly defeated the goal. Frankly, not all of the politicians had agreed on the premise of compromise. Other politicians had painted themselves into a corner with their constituents, unable to reach across the aisle after lambasting the other party during the election cycle.

The current voter discontent has translated into a loud demand for a different kind of change. Invigorated citizen groups, such as the Tea Party organization, are leading the cause to “throw the bums out.” The renewed anti-incumbent mentality is driven by a dysfunctional Congress that can’t pass meaningful legislation. In an effort to be heard, will voters sacrifice party loyalty and vote for new, anti-establishment candidates?

The recent election in Massachusetts and the Republican primary in Texas have put all elected officials on notice that the “sleeping giant” of the electorate has awoken. The anti-Washington sentiment raised by the voters in Massachusetts was validated in Texas. Given the results, change continues to evolve in American politics, and tangible change may be coming to Washington sooner rather than later.

But there is a dilemma. Voters are also responsible for the dysfunctional Congress they elect. In recent years, they have driven out the centrists and elected more and more politicians who are ideological in their views, whether on the right or the left. “Compromise” has become a four-letter word. The challenge becomes how to elect lawmakers who will truly represent the will of their constituents when they get to Washington, D.C.

No sitting member of Congress is safe from voter unrest. While the results of this year’s elections are uncertain, the majority of incumbent elected officials are concerned about their futures, and rightfully so. Will voter discontent lead to a greater sense of political cooperation, or will the electorate achieve the unintended: more political gridlock?  

SEMA News - May 2010

By Dan Sadowski

Contentious Election Year Leads to Uncertain Political Landscape

The 2010 mid-term elections are around the corner, and at no time in recent history has Washington been so divided. While 2008 represented an election of “change,” aspirations of bipartisan cooperation quickly evaporated in 2009. Lawmakers could not agree on how to stimulate the economy before becoming mired in the debate to reform the American health care system. 

Town halls were held. Press conferences staged. Speeches delivered to Congress and the American people. Even a televised, bipartisan summit was arranged. Yet, as the health care debate continued, the American political landscape was as divided as ever—leading many to question whether change was even possible. 

The health care debate illustrates the problem. It is an issue that elicits strong opinions. On this topic, the two parties have fundamental differences in approach that seem impossible to bridge. The Democrats are focused on enrolling all Americans into a system that will include heavy financial obligations, while the Republicans want an incremental approach to drive down costs and preserve the private marketplace but not guarantee universal coverage. Result: gridlock and unilateral actions—the opposite of bipartisanship and compromise. The debate has also produced voter anger, a recipe for the formation of third parties.

This is not the first time exasperated voters have looked beyond the two-party system. Recent alternatives have included Ross Perot, John Anderson and, looking back a bit farther, Huey Long and Teddy Roosevelt. They bear different labels—the Reform Party, Populists and Progressives and, most recently, Tea Party. 

When President Obama was inaugurated just over one year ago, the American people were optimistic for a promised new era of cooperation in Washington. Expectations were high yet naive and perhaps unrealistic. Missteps and partisan animosity quickly defeated the goal. Frankly, not all of the politicians had agreed on the premise of compromise. Other politicians had painted themselves into a corner with their constituents, unable to reach across the aisle after lambasting the other party during the election cycle.

The current voter discontent has translated into a loud demand for a different kind of change. Invigorated citizen groups, such as the Tea Party organization, are leading the cause to “throw the bums out.” The renewed anti-incumbent mentality is driven by a dysfunctional Congress that can’t pass meaningful legislation. In an effort to be heard, will voters sacrifice party loyalty and vote for new, anti-establishment candidates?

The recent election in Massachusetts and the Republican primary in Texas have put all elected officials on notice that the “sleeping giant” of the electorate has awoken. The anti-Washington sentiment raised by the voters in Massachusetts was validated in Texas. Given the results, change continues to evolve in American politics, and tangible change may be coming to Washington sooner rather than later.

But there is a dilemma. Voters are also responsible for the dysfunctional Congress they elect. In recent years, they have driven out the centrists and elected more and more politicians who are ideological in their views, whether on the right or the left. “Compromise” has become a four-letter word. The challenge becomes how to elect lawmakers who will truly represent the will of their constituents when they get to Washington, D.C.

No sitting member of Congress is safe from voter unrest. While the results of this year’s elections are uncertain, the majority of incumbent elected officials are concerned about their futures, and rightfully so. Will voter discontent lead to a greater sense of political cooperation, or will the electorate achieve the unintended: more political gridlock?