SEMA News—February 2013

FROM THE HILL
By Dan Sadowski

Election Results Demand Legislative Compromise, But Outlook for New Congress Remains Unclear

A Fresh Start in Washington?

	During the ’80s, Republican President Ronald Reagan (left) forged many bipartisan compromises with Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library

Before last year’s election, we predicted that the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate would remain divided along party lines. The election results proved that prognosis to be correct. President Obama was reelected; Republicans continue to control the House and Democrats control the Senate. With the election behind us, we can now more fully explore the ramifications of continued divided government.

In the SEMA News November 2012 “From the Hill” column, we argued that if House and Senate control remained split, President Obama (or Romney) would be required to establish a tone of bipartisanship and cooperation early in his term to ensure any hope of legislative progress. However, while it appears to have been a “status-quo election,” there were changes of consequence.

President Obama earned a convincing victory, and Democrats increased their membership in both the House and Senate. As a consequence, the primary responsibility for fostering bipartisanship may have shifted from the president to Republicans on Capitol Hill. Conversely, President Obama will be tested on whether he has the leadership skills to bring the parties together and forge agreements. Much has been written about the compromises fostered by President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Can this be President Obama’s “Reagan Moment?” The short- and long-term fate of the country may depend on the answer.

Both sides enter the fray knowing that voters sent a clear message in the November election. Gridlock is unacceptable, and the president and Congress are expected to address the nation’s many fiscal and social problems rather than campaigning for the next election. Voters want the politicians to understand that it is possible to reach an accord that can be viewed by each party as a solution, not a victory nor a defeat.

Both sides also are well-versed in history. They know that divided government can work. Although it has failed recently, there have been previous times when split control was viewed as a way to maintain checks and balances. Recent examples from the ’90s include welfare reform and tax increases/spending cuts that led to economic prosperity. In the ’80s, a divided Congress and the president were also able to put in place the last major reforms of the tax and social security systems.

As this column is being written, the lame-duck Congress is meeting to decide if an accord can be reached on the nation’s budget to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.” Both House Republicans and the president are using careful language to demonstrate toughness while remaining optimistic for a bipartisan compromise to avoid massive tax increases and uncontrolled spending cuts. How the issue is resolved will set the tone in Washington for the immediate future.

Improving relationships between lawmakers plays a vital role in negotiating compromises. The last four years provided scores of examples of dysfunction, from abuse of the Senate filibuster to the president’s abstaining to work with Republicans on bipartisan solutions. The year 2013 offers an opportunity to hit the reset button.

We may have finally reached the end of the road in terms of avoiding decisions on issues of national importance. Kicking the can down the road has lost its appeal. A feeble economy, high unemployment, skyrocketing deficits and underfunded entitlement programs demand attention.

While it is also clear that the American public wants lawmakers to address domestic issues, the political landscape will likely be shaped as well by international events, including the state of the European economy, the crisis in the Middle East and the fight to deter a nuclear Iran.

So what does the election result mean for small-business owners? Lawmakers will decide whether to extend a number of tax breaks for businesses or reduce the overall corporate tax rate instead. The measures include renewal of the research-and-development tax credit, the bonus depreciation credit and Section 179 deduction. Capital gains tax rates may increase while the estate tax reverts to 2001 levels. The 2% payroll tax cut may end for workers, and income tax rates may increase for people at the 25%-or-above level.

As the new Congress convenes, SEMA’s government affairs office continues to advocate for common-sense solutions on behalf of member companies. The need for economic clarity and regulatory relief are key issues. The initial signs on Capitol Hill that lawmakers understand this need are positive. Should this environment of tentative bipartisanship continue, the results for SEMA members and business owners could be very positive.

For more information on the 113th Congress and how SEMA’s government affairs office is protecting your industry, your voice and your future on Capitol Hill, contact Dan Sadowski, director of congressional affairs, at dans@sema.org. 

SEMA News—February 2013

FROM THE HILL
By Dan Sadowski

Election Results Demand Legislative Compromise, But Outlook for New Congress Remains Unclear

A Fresh Start in Washington?

	During the ’80s, Republican President Ronald Reagan (left) forged many bipartisan compromises with Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library

Before last year’s election, we predicted that the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate would remain divided along party lines. The election results proved that prognosis to be correct. President Obama was reelected; Republicans continue to control the House and Democrats control the Senate. With the election behind us, we can now more fully explore the ramifications of continued divided government.

In the SEMA News November 2012 “From the Hill” column, we argued that if House and Senate control remained split, President Obama (or Romney) would be required to establish a tone of bipartisanship and cooperation early in his term to ensure any hope of legislative progress. However, while it appears to have been a “status-quo election,” there were changes of consequence.

President Obama earned a convincing victory, and Democrats increased their membership in both the House and Senate. As a consequence, the primary responsibility for fostering bipartisanship may have shifted from the president to Republicans on Capitol Hill. Conversely, President Obama will be tested on whether he has the leadership skills to bring the parties together and forge agreements. Much has been written about the compromises fostered by President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Can this be President Obama’s “Reagan Moment?” The short- and long-term fate of the country may depend on the answer.

Both sides enter the fray knowing that voters sent a clear message in the November election. Gridlock is unacceptable, and the president and Congress are expected to address the nation’s many fiscal and social problems rather than campaigning for the next election. Voters want the politicians to understand that it is possible to reach an accord that can be viewed by each party as a solution, not a victory nor a defeat.

Both sides also are well-versed in history. They know that divided government can work. Although it has failed recently, there have been previous times when split control was viewed as a way to maintain checks and balances. Recent examples from the ’90s include welfare reform and tax increases/spending cuts that led to economic prosperity. In the ’80s, a divided Congress and the president were also able to put in place the last major reforms of the tax and social security systems.

As this column is being written, the lame-duck Congress is meeting to decide if an accord can be reached on the nation’s budget to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.” Both House Republicans and the president are using careful language to demonstrate toughness while remaining optimistic for a bipartisan compromise to avoid massive tax increases and uncontrolled spending cuts. How the issue is resolved will set the tone in Washington for the immediate future.

Improving relationships between lawmakers plays a vital role in negotiating compromises. The last four years provided scores of examples of dysfunction, from abuse of the Senate filibuster to the president’s abstaining to work with Republicans on bipartisan solutions. The year 2013 offers an opportunity to hit the reset button.

We may have finally reached the end of the road in terms of avoiding decisions on issues of national importance. Kicking the can down the road has lost its appeal. A feeble economy, high unemployment, skyrocketing deficits and underfunded entitlement programs demand attention.

While it is also clear that the American public wants lawmakers to address domestic issues, the political landscape will likely be shaped as well by international events, including the state of the European economy, the crisis in the Middle East and the fight to deter a nuclear Iran.

So what does the election result mean for small-business owners? Lawmakers will decide whether to extend a number of tax breaks for businesses or reduce the overall corporate tax rate instead. The measures include renewal of the research-and-development tax credit, the bonus depreciation credit and Section 179 deduction. Capital gains tax rates may increase while the estate tax reverts to 2001 levels. The 2% payroll tax cut may end for workers, and income tax rates may increase for people at the 25%-or-above level.

As the new Congress convenes, SEMA’s government affairs office continues to advocate for common-sense solutions on behalf of member companies. The need for economic clarity and regulatory relief are key issues. The initial signs on Capitol Hill that lawmakers understand this need are positive. Should this environment of tentative bipartisanship continue, the results for SEMA members and business owners could be very positive.

For more information on the 113th Congress and how SEMA’s government affairs office is protecting your industry, your voice and your future on Capitol Hill, contact Dan Sadowski, director of congressional affairs, at dans@sema.org. 

SEMA News—February 2013

FROM THE HILL
By Dan Sadowski

Election Results Demand Legislative Compromise, But Outlook for New Congress Remains Unclear

A Fresh Start in Washington?

	During the ’80s, Republican President Ronald Reagan (left) forged many bipartisan compromises with Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library

Before last year’s election, we predicted that the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate would remain divided along party lines. The election results proved that prognosis to be correct. President Obama was reelected; Republicans continue to control the House and Democrats control the Senate. With the election behind us, we can now more fully explore the ramifications of continued divided government.

In the SEMA News November 2012 “From the Hill” column, we argued that if House and Senate control remained split, President Obama (or Romney) would be required to establish a tone of bipartisanship and cooperation early in his term to ensure any hope of legislative progress. However, while it appears to have been a “status-quo election,” there were changes of consequence.

President Obama earned a convincing victory, and Democrats increased their membership in both the House and Senate. As a consequence, the primary responsibility for fostering bipartisanship may have shifted from the president to Republicans on Capitol Hill. Conversely, President Obama will be tested on whether he has the leadership skills to bring the parties together and forge agreements. Much has been written about the compromises fostered by President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Can this be President Obama’s “Reagan Moment?” The short- and long-term fate of the country may depend on the answer.

Both sides enter the fray knowing that voters sent a clear message in the November election. Gridlock is unacceptable, and the president and Congress are expected to address the nation’s many fiscal and social problems rather than campaigning for the next election. Voters want the politicians to understand that it is possible to reach an accord that can be viewed by each party as a solution, not a victory nor a defeat.

Both sides also are well-versed in history. They know that divided government can work. Although it has failed recently, there have been previous times when split control was viewed as a way to maintain checks and balances. Recent examples from the ’90s include welfare reform and tax increases/spending cuts that led to economic prosperity. In the ’80s, a divided Congress and the president were also able to put in place the last major reforms of the tax and social security systems.

As this column is being written, the lame-duck Congress is meeting to decide if an accord can be reached on the nation’s budget to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.” Both House Republicans and the president are using careful language to demonstrate toughness while remaining optimistic for a bipartisan compromise to avoid massive tax increases and uncontrolled spending cuts. How the issue is resolved will set the tone in Washington for the immediate future.

Improving relationships between lawmakers plays a vital role in negotiating compromises. The last four years provided scores of examples of dysfunction, from abuse of the Senate filibuster to the president’s abstaining to work with Republicans on bipartisan solutions. The year 2013 offers an opportunity to hit the reset button.

We may have finally reached the end of the road in terms of avoiding decisions on issues of national importance. Kicking the can down the road has lost its appeal. A feeble economy, high unemployment, skyrocketing deficits and underfunded entitlement programs demand attention.

While it is also clear that the American public wants lawmakers to address domestic issues, the political landscape will likely be shaped as well by international events, including the state of the European economy, the crisis in the Middle East and the fight to deter a nuclear Iran.

So what does the election result mean for small-business owners? Lawmakers will decide whether to extend a number of tax breaks for businesses or reduce the overall corporate tax rate instead. The measures include renewal of the research-and-development tax credit, the bonus depreciation credit and Section 179 deduction. Capital gains tax rates may increase while the estate tax reverts to 2001 levels. The 2% payroll tax cut may end for workers, and income tax rates may increase for people at the 25%-or-above level.

As the new Congress convenes, SEMA’s government affairs office continues to advocate for common-sense solutions on behalf of member companies. The need for economic clarity and regulatory relief are key issues. The initial signs on Capitol Hill that lawmakers understand this need are positive. Should this environment of tentative bipartisanship continue, the results for SEMA members and business owners could be very positive.

For more information on the 113th Congress and how SEMA’s government affairs office is protecting your industry, your voice and your future on Capitol Hill, contact Dan Sadowski, director of congressional affairs, at dans@sema.org. 

SEMA News—February 2013

FROM THE HILL
By Dan Sadowski

Election Results Demand Legislative Compromise, But Outlook for New Congress Remains Unclear

A Fresh Start in Washington?

	During the ’80s, Republican President Ronald Reagan (left) forged many bipartisan compromises with Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library

Before last year’s election, we predicted that the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate would remain divided along party lines. The election results proved that prognosis to be correct. President Obama was reelected; Republicans continue to control the House and Democrats control the Senate. With the election behind us, we can now more fully explore the ramifications of continued divided government.

In the SEMA News November 2012 “From the Hill” column, we argued that if House and Senate control remained split, President Obama (or Romney) would be required to establish a tone of bipartisanship and cooperation early in his term to ensure any hope of legislative progress. However, while it appears to have been a “status-quo election,” there were changes of consequence.

President Obama earned a convincing victory, and Democrats increased their membership in both the House and Senate. As a consequence, the primary responsibility for fostering bipartisanship may have shifted from the president to Republicans on Capitol Hill. Conversely, President Obama will be tested on whether he has the leadership skills to bring the parties together and forge agreements. Much has been written about the compromises fostered by President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Can this be President Obama’s “Reagan Moment?” The short- and long-term fate of the country may depend on the answer.

Both sides enter the fray knowing that voters sent a clear message in the November election. Gridlock is unacceptable, and the president and Congress are expected to address the nation’s many fiscal and social problems rather than campaigning for the next election. Voters want the politicians to understand that it is possible to reach an accord that can be viewed by each party as a solution, not a victory nor a defeat.

Both sides also are well-versed in history. They know that divided government can work. Although it has failed recently, there have been previous times when split control was viewed as a way to maintain checks and balances. Recent examples from the ’90s include welfare reform and tax increases/spending cuts that led to economic prosperity. In the ’80s, a divided Congress and the president were also able to put in place the last major reforms of the tax and social security systems.

As this column is being written, the lame-duck Congress is meeting to decide if an accord can be reached on the nation’s budget to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.” Both House Republicans and the president are using careful language to demonstrate toughness while remaining optimistic for a bipartisan compromise to avoid massive tax increases and uncontrolled spending cuts. How the issue is resolved will set the tone in Washington for the immediate future.

Improving relationships between lawmakers plays a vital role in negotiating compromises. The last four years provided scores of examples of dysfunction, from abuse of the Senate filibuster to the president’s abstaining to work with Republicans on bipartisan solutions. The year 2013 offers an opportunity to hit the reset button.

We may have finally reached the end of the road in terms of avoiding decisions on issues of national importance. Kicking the can down the road has lost its appeal. A feeble economy, high unemployment, skyrocketing deficits and underfunded entitlement programs demand attention.

While it is also clear that the American public wants lawmakers to address domestic issues, the political landscape will likely be shaped as well by international events, including the state of the European economy, the crisis in the Middle East and the fight to deter a nuclear Iran.

So what does the election result mean for small-business owners? Lawmakers will decide whether to extend a number of tax breaks for businesses or reduce the overall corporate tax rate instead. The measures include renewal of the research-and-development tax credit, the bonus depreciation credit and Section 179 deduction. Capital gains tax rates may increase while the estate tax reverts to 2001 levels. The 2% payroll tax cut may end for workers, and income tax rates may increase for people at the 25%-or-above level.

As the new Congress convenes, SEMA’s government affairs office continues to advocate for common-sense solutions on behalf of member companies. The need for economic clarity and regulatory relief are key issues. The initial signs on Capitol Hill that lawmakers understand this need are positive. Should this environment of tentative bipartisanship continue, the results for SEMA members and business owners could be very positive.

For more information on the 113th Congress and how SEMA’s government affairs office is protecting your industry, your voice and your future on Capitol Hill, contact Dan Sadowski, director of congressional affairs, at dans@sema.org. 

SEMA News—February 2013

FROM THE HILL
By Dan Sadowski

Election Results Demand Legislative Compromise, But Outlook for New Congress Remains Unclear

A Fresh Start in Washington?

	During the ’80s, Republican President Ronald Reagan (left) forged many bipartisan compromises with Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library

Before last year’s election, we predicted that the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate would remain divided along party lines. The election results proved that prognosis to be correct. President Obama was reelected; Republicans continue to control the House and Democrats control the Senate. With the election behind us, we can now more fully explore the ramifications of continued divided government.

In the SEMA News November 2012 “From the Hill” column, we argued that if House and Senate control remained split, President Obama (or Romney) would be required to establish a tone of bipartisanship and cooperation early in his term to ensure any hope of legislative progress. However, while it appears to have been a “status-quo election,” there were changes of consequence.

President Obama earned a convincing victory, and Democrats increased their membership in both the House and Senate. As a consequence, the primary responsibility for fostering bipartisanship may have shifted from the president to Republicans on Capitol Hill. Conversely, President Obama will be tested on whether he has the leadership skills to bring the parties together and forge agreements. Much has been written about the compromises fostered by President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Can this be President Obama’s “Reagan Moment?” The short- and long-term fate of the country may depend on the answer.

Both sides enter the fray knowing that voters sent a clear message in the November election. Gridlock is unacceptable, and the president and Congress are expected to address the nation’s many fiscal and social problems rather than campaigning for the next election. Voters want the politicians to understand that it is possible to reach an accord that can be viewed by each party as a solution, not a victory nor a defeat.

Both sides also are well-versed in history. They know that divided government can work. Although it has failed recently, there have been previous times when split control was viewed as a way to maintain checks and balances. Recent examples from the ’90s include welfare reform and tax increases/spending cuts that led to economic prosperity. In the ’80s, a divided Congress and the president were also able to put in place the last major reforms of the tax and social security systems.

As this column is being written, the lame-duck Congress is meeting to decide if an accord can be reached on the nation’s budget to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.” Both House Republicans and the president are using careful language to demonstrate toughness while remaining optimistic for a bipartisan compromise to avoid massive tax increases and uncontrolled spending cuts. How the issue is resolved will set the tone in Washington for the immediate future.

Improving relationships between lawmakers plays a vital role in negotiating compromises. The last four years provided scores of examples of dysfunction, from abuse of the Senate filibuster to the president’s abstaining to work with Republicans on bipartisan solutions. The year 2013 offers an opportunity to hit the reset button.

We may have finally reached the end of the road in terms of avoiding decisions on issues of national importance. Kicking the can down the road has lost its appeal. A feeble economy, high unemployment, skyrocketing deficits and underfunded entitlement programs demand attention.

While it is also clear that the American public wants lawmakers to address domestic issues, the political landscape will likely be shaped as well by international events, including the state of the European economy, the crisis in the Middle East and the fight to deter a nuclear Iran.

So what does the election result mean for small-business owners? Lawmakers will decide whether to extend a number of tax breaks for businesses or reduce the overall corporate tax rate instead. The measures include renewal of the research-and-development tax credit, the bonus depreciation credit and Section 179 deduction. Capital gains tax rates may increase while the estate tax reverts to 2001 levels. The 2% payroll tax cut may end for workers, and income tax rates may increase for people at the 25%-or-above level.

As the new Congress convenes, SEMA’s government affairs office continues to advocate for common-sense solutions on behalf of member companies. The need for economic clarity and regulatory relief are key issues. The initial signs on Capitol Hill that lawmakers understand this need are positive. Should this environment of tentative bipartisanship continue, the results for SEMA members and business owners could be very positive.

For more information on the 113th Congress and how SEMA’s government affairs office is protecting your industry, your voice and your future on Capitol Hill, contact Dan Sadowski, director of congressional affairs, at dans@sema.org. 

SEMA News—February 2013

FROM THE HILL
By Dan Sadowski

Election Results Demand Legislative Compromise, But Outlook for New Congress Remains Unclear

A Fresh Start in Washington?

	During the ’80s, Republican President Ronald Reagan (left) forged many bipartisan compromises with Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library

Before last year’s election, we predicted that the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate would remain divided along party lines. The election results proved that prognosis to be correct. President Obama was reelected; Republicans continue to control the House and Democrats control the Senate. With the election behind us, we can now more fully explore the ramifications of continued divided government.

In the SEMA News November 2012 “From the Hill” column, we argued that if House and Senate control remained split, President Obama (or Romney) would be required to establish a tone of bipartisanship and cooperation early in his term to ensure any hope of legislative progress. However, while it appears to have been a “status-quo election,” there were changes of consequence.

President Obama earned a convincing victory, and Democrats increased their membership in both the House and Senate. As a consequence, the primary responsibility for fostering bipartisanship may have shifted from the president to Republicans on Capitol Hill. Conversely, President Obama will be tested on whether he has the leadership skills to bring the parties together and forge agreements. Much has been written about the compromises fostered by President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neill. Can this be President Obama’s “Reagan Moment?” The short- and long-term fate of the country may depend on the answer.

Both sides enter the fray knowing that voters sent a clear message in the November election. Gridlock is unacceptable, and the president and Congress are expected to address the nation’s many fiscal and social problems rather than campaigning for the next election. Voters want the politicians to understand that it is possible to reach an accord that can be viewed by each party as a solution, not a victory nor a defeat.

Both sides also are well-versed in history. They know that divided government can work. Although it has failed recently, there have been previous times when split control was viewed as a way to maintain checks and balances. Recent examples from the ’90s include welfare reform and tax increases/spending cuts that led to economic prosperity. In the ’80s, a divided Congress and the president were also able to put in place the last major reforms of the tax and social security systems.

As this column is being written, the lame-duck Congress is meeting to decide if an accord can be reached on the nation’s budget to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.” Both House Republicans and the president are using careful language to demonstrate toughness while remaining optimistic for a bipartisan compromise to avoid massive tax increases and uncontrolled spending cuts. How the issue is resolved will set the tone in Washington for the immediate future.

Improving relationships between lawmakers plays a vital role in negotiating compromises. The last four years provided scores of examples of dysfunction, from abuse of the Senate filibuster to the president’s abstaining to work with Republicans on bipartisan solutions. The year 2013 offers an opportunity to hit the reset button.

We may have finally reached the end of the road in terms of avoiding decisions on issues of national importance. Kicking the can down the road has lost its appeal. A feeble economy, high unemployment, skyrocketing deficits and underfunded entitlement programs demand attention.

While it is also clear that the American public wants lawmakers to address domestic issues, the political landscape will likely be shaped as well by international events, including the state of the European economy, the crisis in the Middle East and the fight to deter a nuclear Iran.

So what does the election result mean for small-business owners? Lawmakers will decide whether to extend a number of tax breaks for businesses or reduce the overall corporate tax rate instead. The measures include renewal of the research-and-development tax credit, the bonus depreciation credit and Section 179 deduction. Capital gains tax rates may increase while the estate tax reverts to 2001 levels. The 2% payroll tax cut may end for workers, and income tax rates may increase for people at the 25%-or-above level.

As the new Congress convenes, SEMA’s government affairs office continues to advocate for common-sense solutions on behalf of member companies. The need for economic clarity and regulatory relief are key issues. The initial signs on Capitol Hill that lawmakers understand this need are positive. Should this environment of tentative bipartisanship continue, the results for SEMA members and business owners could be very positive.

For more information on the 113th Congress and how SEMA’s government affairs office is protecting your industry, your voice and your future on Capitol Hill, contact Dan Sadowski, director of congressional affairs, at dans@sema.org. 

SEMA News—February 2013

EVENTS
By Steve Campbell

Auctions Bring in Nearly $57,000 for SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund

Dozens of Sponsors Take Part in Ford Mustang Build and Ed Pink Engine Project

	This ’13 Ford Mustang GT was customized during the SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women project in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. Cole Lannum placed the winning bid of $46,775, with proceeds going to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund.

Two projects have brought nearly $57,000 to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, which is dedicated to fostering the next generation of automotive leaders and innovators. Proceeds from two auctions will help provide assistance to university, college and trade-school students seeking careers in the automotive industry. The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women and a custom engine to be built by Ed Pink Racing Engines were sold on eBay through Auction Cause, with parts and labor supplied by dozens of automotive businesses.

The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women was covered extensively in consumer media. The ’13 Mustang GT—now known as “High Gear”—was customized in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. The SEMA Businesswomen’s Network created the project to highlight the talents of women working in automobile businesses, and they were given maximum support by Ford Motor Co., which donated the stock vehicle, Source Interlink Media, which hosted much of the modification work at its headquarters in El Segundo, California, and nearly 40 specialty-equipment companies that provided components (see “SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors” sidebar).

Cole Lannum, who works in finance for a large health-care company, placed the winning bid of $46,775. He doesn’t consider himself an enthusiast, but he loves cars just the same—especially the Mustang.

“Despite all the press the buildup got, I found out about it only because I follow Auction Cause,” he said. “As soon as I saw the Mustang, before I had any idea of the story behind it, I just fell in love with the car. When I looked deeper and saw what had been done, all the effort that went into it, all the people who were involved and all the work the women did, it really blew me away. The more I looked at it, the more impressed I was and the more excited I became about the car.”

	The ’13 Mustang GT made national headlines during the summer of 2012 when more than 40 women volunteered their time and expertise to customize the vehicle in less than two months. The “High Gear” team poses here with the Mustang at the 2012 SEMA Show.

Lannum said that the reason he follows Auction Cause is its work with charities. When he found that the car’s whole purpose was to help the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, that was the icing on the cake.

“The car is obviously unique,” he said, “but you can’t beat the fact that the auction also helps the fund.”

The winner of the Ed Pink engine auction was equally adamant about the proceeds going to the SEMA Scholarship Fund, noting that he is himself a 1984 graduate of the Wyoming Tech automotive trade school.

Rodney Johnson and his brother run the family marine business, which handles tie-ups and hose connections for ships that onload and offload oil at the docks around Martinez and Benicia, California. Johnson has been into cars his entire life and found out about the engine auction because he follows SEMA on Facebook. He read a notice and then went to eBay to track the auction, placing a bid fairly early and then outbidding a competitor to take the prize for $10,202. Ed Pink Racing Engines of Van Nuys, California, will build the small-block Chevy to Johnson’s specifications, and the package included a trip to the 2012 PRI Show in Florida.

“I knew that the parts would be worth more than what the current bid was,” he said, “and it turned into of those deals that you just can’t pass up. After I won, I went to the PRI Show and talked with Ed Pink and Frank Honsowetz [Pink’s general manager] for about an hour. I’ve been building a ’55 Chevy for my dad for about 10 years, and that’s where the engine will go.”

	Auction winner Rod Johnson with a Pink Racing Engine similar to the one that will be custom-built for his project Chevy.
	Rod Johnson (from left), winner of the 2012 SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund engine auction, talked with Ed Pink and Ed Pink Racing Engines GM Frank Honsowetz at the 2012 PRI Trade Show about how his engine will be built. Johnson’s winning bid was $10,202.
	Aside from helping the engine to make substantially more power, the Edelbrock supercharger on the High Gear Mustang has been signed by Vic Edelbrock himself.

The truck will essentially be a street rod, Johnson said. It is already equipped with air-ride suspension, suicide doors and a smoothed body.

“My dad will drive it,” Johnson said, “so we wanted the engine to be very reliable but with as much power as they could build into it. We figured it would displace about 383–388 ci and put out about 475 hp.”

Twenty SEMA-member firms were slated to participate in the engine build. Components were to be provided by ARP, ATI, Champion, Clevite, COMP Cams, Dart Machinery, Edelbrock, FAST, Fel-Pro, Hedman Hedders, Joe Gibbs Driven, Mahle, Manley Performance, March, Milodon, Moroso, Power Master, Scat, Speed Pro and Total Seal.

The sponsors of the auctions and other fundraising efforts over the years have allowed the Memorial Scholarship Fund to distribute more than $1.5 million to students involved in automotive curricula.

SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors

 

SEMA News—February 2013

EVENTS
By Steve Campbell

Auctions Bring in Nearly $57,000 for SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund

Dozens of Sponsors Take Part in Ford Mustang Build and Ed Pink Engine Project

	This ’13 Ford Mustang GT was customized during the SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women project in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. Cole Lannum placed the winning bid of $46,775, with proceeds going to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund.

Two projects have brought nearly $57,000 to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, which is dedicated to fostering the next generation of automotive leaders and innovators. Proceeds from two auctions will help provide assistance to university, college and trade-school students seeking careers in the automotive industry. The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women and a custom engine to be built by Ed Pink Racing Engines were sold on eBay through Auction Cause, with parts and labor supplied by dozens of automotive businesses.

The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women was covered extensively in consumer media. The ’13 Mustang GT—now known as “High Gear”—was customized in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. The SEMA Businesswomen’s Network created the project to highlight the talents of women working in automobile businesses, and they were given maximum support by Ford Motor Co., which donated the stock vehicle, Source Interlink Media, which hosted much of the modification work at its headquarters in El Segundo, California, and nearly 40 specialty-equipment companies that provided components (see “SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors” sidebar).

Cole Lannum, who works in finance for a large health-care company, placed the winning bid of $46,775. He doesn’t consider himself an enthusiast, but he loves cars just the same—especially the Mustang.

“Despite all the press the buildup got, I found out about it only because I follow Auction Cause,” he said. “As soon as I saw the Mustang, before I had any idea of the story behind it, I just fell in love with the car. When I looked deeper and saw what had been done, all the effort that went into it, all the people who were involved and all the work the women did, it really blew me away. The more I looked at it, the more impressed I was and the more excited I became about the car.”

	The ’13 Mustang GT made national headlines during the summer of 2012 when more than 40 women volunteered their time and expertise to customize the vehicle in less than two months. The “High Gear” team poses here with the Mustang at the 2012 SEMA Show.

Lannum said that the reason he follows Auction Cause is its work with charities. When he found that the car’s whole purpose was to help the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, that was the icing on the cake.

“The car is obviously unique,” he said, “but you can’t beat the fact that the auction also helps the fund.”

The winner of the Ed Pink engine auction was equally adamant about the proceeds going to the SEMA Scholarship Fund, noting that he is himself a 1984 graduate of the Wyoming Tech automotive trade school.

Rodney Johnson and his brother run the family marine business, which handles tie-ups and hose connections for ships that onload and offload oil at the docks around Martinez and Benicia, California. Johnson has been into cars his entire life and found out about the engine auction because he follows SEMA on Facebook. He read a notice and then went to eBay to track the auction, placing a bid fairly early and then outbidding a competitor to take the prize for $10,202. Ed Pink Racing Engines of Van Nuys, California, will build the small-block Chevy to Johnson’s specifications, and the package included a trip to the 2012 PRI Show in Florida.

“I knew that the parts would be worth more than what the current bid was,” he said, “and it turned into of those deals that you just can’t pass up. After I won, I went to the PRI Show and talked with Ed Pink and Frank Honsowetz [Pink’s general manager] for about an hour. I’ve been building a ’55 Chevy for my dad for about 10 years, and that’s where the engine will go.”

	Auction winner Rod Johnson with a Pink Racing Engine similar to the one that will be custom-built for his project Chevy.
	Rod Johnson (from left), winner of the 2012 SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund engine auction, talked with Ed Pink and Ed Pink Racing Engines GM Frank Honsowetz at the 2012 PRI Trade Show about how his engine will be built. Johnson’s winning bid was $10,202.
	Aside from helping the engine to make substantially more power, the Edelbrock supercharger on the High Gear Mustang has been signed by Vic Edelbrock himself.

The truck will essentially be a street rod, Johnson said. It is already equipped with air-ride suspension, suicide doors and a smoothed body.

“My dad will drive it,” Johnson said, “so we wanted the engine to be very reliable but with as much power as they could build into it. We figured it would displace about 383–388 ci and put out about 475 hp.”

Twenty SEMA-member firms were slated to participate in the engine build. Components were to be provided by ARP, ATI, Champion, Clevite, COMP Cams, Dart Machinery, Edelbrock, FAST, Fel-Pro, Hedman Hedders, Joe Gibbs Driven, Mahle, Manley Performance, March, Milodon, Moroso, Power Master, Scat, Speed Pro and Total Seal.

The sponsors of the auctions and other fundraising efforts over the years have allowed the Memorial Scholarship Fund to distribute more than $1.5 million to students involved in automotive curricula.

SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors

 

SEMA News—February 2013

EVENTS
By Steve Campbell

Auctions Bring in Nearly $57,000 for SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund

Dozens of Sponsors Take Part in Ford Mustang Build and Ed Pink Engine Project

	This ’13 Ford Mustang GT was customized during the SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women project in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. Cole Lannum placed the winning bid of $46,775, with proceeds going to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund.

Two projects have brought nearly $57,000 to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, which is dedicated to fostering the next generation of automotive leaders and innovators. Proceeds from two auctions will help provide assistance to university, college and trade-school students seeking careers in the automotive industry. The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women and a custom engine to be built by Ed Pink Racing Engines were sold on eBay through Auction Cause, with parts and labor supplied by dozens of automotive businesses.

The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women was covered extensively in consumer media. The ’13 Mustang GT—now known as “High Gear”—was customized in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. The SEMA Businesswomen’s Network created the project to highlight the talents of women working in automobile businesses, and they were given maximum support by Ford Motor Co., which donated the stock vehicle, Source Interlink Media, which hosted much of the modification work at its headquarters in El Segundo, California, and nearly 40 specialty-equipment companies that provided components (see “SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors” sidebar).

Cole Lannum, who works in finance for a large health-care company, placed the winning bid of $46,775. He doesn’t consider himself an enthusiast, but he loves cars just the same—especially the Mustang.

“Despite all the press the buildup got, I found out about it only because I follow Auction Cause,” he said. “As soon as I saw the Mustang, before I had any idea of the story behind it, I just fell in love with the car. When I looked deeper and saw what had been done, all the effort that went into it, all the people who were involved and all the work the women did, it really blew me away. The more I looked at it, the more impressed I was and the more excited I became about the car.”

	The ’13 Mustang GT made national headlines during the summer of 2012 when more than 40 women volunteered their time and expertise to customize the vehicle in less than two months. The “High Gear” team poses here with the Mustang at the 2012 SEMA Show.

Lannum said that the reason he follows Auction Cause is its work with charities. When he found that the car’s whole purpose was to help the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, that was the icing on the cake.

“The car is obviously unique,” he said, “but you can’t beat the fact that the auction also helps the fund.”

The winner of the Ed Pink engine auction was equally adamant about the proceeds going to the SEMA Scholarship Fund, noting that he is himself a 1984 graduate of the Wyoming Tech automotive trade school.

Rodney Johnson and his brother run the family marine business, which handles tie-ups and hose connections for ships that onload and offload oil at the docks around Martinez and Benicia, California. Johnson has been into cars his entire life and found out about the engine auction because he follows SEMA on Facebook. He read a notice and then went to eBay to track the auction, placing a bid fairly early and then outbidding a competitor to take the prize for $10,202. Ed Pink Racing Engines of Van Nuys, California, will build the small-block Chevy to Johnson’s specifications, and the package included a trip to the 2012 PRI Show in Florida.

“I knew that the parts would be worth more than what the current bid was,” he said, “and it turned into of those deals that you just can’t pass up. After I won, I went to the PRI Show and talked with Ed Pink and Frank Honsowetz [Pink’s general manager] for about an hour. I’ve been building a ’55 Chevy for my dad for about 10 years, and that’s where the engine will go.”

	Auction winner Rod Johnson with a Pink Racing Engine similar to the one that will be custom-built for his project Chevy.
	Rod Johnson (from left), winner of the 2012 SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund engine auction, talked with Ed Pink and Ed Pink Racing Engines GM Frank Honsowetz at the 2012 PRI Trade Show about how his engine will be built. Johnson’s winning bid was $10,202.
	Aside from helping the engine to make substantially more power, the Edelbrock supercharger on the High Gear Mustang has been signed by Vic Edelbrock himself.

The truck will essentially be a street rod, Johnson said. It is already equipped with air-ride suspension, suicide doors and a smoothed body.

“My dad will drive it,” Johnson said, “so we wanted the engine to be very reliable but with as much power as they could build into it. We figured it would displace about 383–388 ci and put out about 475 hp.”

Twenty SEMA-member firms were slated to participate in the engine build. Components were to be provided by ARP, ATI, Champion, Clevite, COMP Cams, Dart Machinery, Edelbrock, FAST, Fel-Pro, Hedman Hedders, Joe Gibbs Driven, Mahle, Manley Performance, March, Milodon, Moroso, Power Master, Scat, Speed Pro and Total Seal.

The sponsors of the auctions and other fundraising efforts over the years have allowed the Memorial Scholarship Fund to distribute more than $1.5 million to students involved in automotive curricula.

SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors

 

SEMA News—February 2013

EVENTS
By Steve Campbell

Auctions Bring in Nearly $57,000 for SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund

Dozens of Sponsors Take Part in Ford Mustang Build and Ed Pink Engine Project

	This ’13 Ford Mustang GT was customized during the SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women project in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. Cole Lannum placed the winning bid of $46,775, with proceeds going to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund.

Two projects have brought nearly $57,000 to the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, which is dedicated to fostering the next generation of automotive leaders and innovators. Proceeds from two auctions will help provide assistance to university, college and trade-school students seeking careers in the automotive industry. The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women and a custom engine to be built by Ed Pink Racing Engines were sold on eBay through Auction Cause, with parts and labor supplied by dozens of automotive businesses.

The SEMA Mustang Build—Powered by Women was covered extensively in consumer media. The ’13 Mustang GT—now known as “High Gear”—was customized in less than two months through the efforts of more than 40 women who volunteered their time and expertise. The SEMA Businesswomen’s Network created the project to highlight the talents of women working in automobile businesses, and they were given maximum support by Ford Motor Co., which donated the stock vehicle, Source Interlink Media, which hosted much of the modification work at its headquarters in El Segundo, California, and nearly 40 specialty-equipment companies that provided components (see “SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors” sidebar).

Cole Lannum, who works in finance for a large health-care company, placed the winning bid of $46,775. He doesn’t consider himself an enthusiast, but he loves cars just the same—especially the Mustang.

“Despite all the press the buildup got, I found out about it only because I follow Auction Cause,” he said. “As soon as I saw the Mustang, before I had any idea of the story behind it, I just fell in love with the car. When I looked deeper and saw what had been done, all the effort that went into it, all the people who were involved and all the work the women did, it really blew me away. The more I looked at it, the more impressed I was and the more excited I became about the car.”

	The ’13 Mustang GT made national headlines during the summer of 2012 when more than 40 women volunteered their time and expertise to customize the vehicle in less than two months. The “High Gear” team poses here with the Mustang at the 2012 SEMA Show.

Lannum said that the reason he follows Auction Cause is its work with charities. When he found that the car’s whole purpose was to help the SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund, that was the icing on the cake.

“The car is obviously unique,” he said, “but you can’t beat the fact that the auction also helps the fund.”

The winner of the Ed Pink engine auction was equally adamant about the proceeds going to the SEMA Scholarship Fund, noting that he is himself a 1984 graduate of the Wyoming Tech automotive trade school.

Rodney Johnson and his brother run the family marine business, which handles tie-ups and hose connections for ships that onload and offload oil at the docks around Martinez and Benicia, California. Johnson has been into cars his entire life and found out about the engine auction because he follows SEMA on Facebook. He read a notice and then went to eBay to track the auction, placing a bid fairly early and then outbidding a competitor to take the prize for $10,202. Ed Pink Racing Engines of Van Nuys, California, will build the small-block Chevy to Johnson’s specifications, and the package included a trip to the 2012 PRI Show in Florida.

“I knew that the parts would be worth more than what the current bid was,” he said, “and it turned into of those deals that you just can’t pass up. After I won, I went to the PRI Show and talked with Ed Pink and Frank Honsowetz [Pink’s general manager] for about an hour. I’ve been building a ’55 Chevy for my dad for about 10 years, and that’s where the engine will go.”

	Auction winner Rod Johnson with a Pink Racing Engine similar to the one that will be custom-built for his project Chevy.
	Rod Johnson (from left), winner of the 2012 SEMA Memorial Scholarship Fund engine auction, talked with Ed Pink and Ed Pink Racing Engines GM Frank Honsowetz at the 2012 PRI Trade Show about how his engine will be built. Johnson’s winning bid was $10,202.
	Aside from helping the engine to make substantially more power, the Edelbrock supercharger on the High Gear Mustang has been signed by Vic Edelbrock himself.

The truck will essentially be a street rod, Johnson said. It is already equipped with air-ride suspension, suicide doors and a smoothed body.

“My dad will drive it,” Johnson said, “so we wanted the engine to be very reliable but with as much power as they could build into it. We figured it would displace about 383–388 ci and put out about 475 hp.”

Twenty SEMA-member firms were slated to participate in the engine build. Components were to be provided by ARP, ATI, Champion, Clevite, COMP Cams, Dart Machinery, Edelbrock, FAST, Fel-Pro, Hedman Hedders, Joe Gibbs Driven, Mahle, Manley Performance, March, Milodon, Moroso, Power Master, Scat, Speed Pro and Total Seal.

The sponsors of the auctions and other fundraising efforts over the years have allowed the Memorial Scholarship Fund to distribute more than $1.5 million to students involved in automotive curricula.

SEMA Mustang Build Sponsors