SEMA eNews Vol. 23, No. 38, September 17, 2020

WTO Rules Against U.S. China Tariffs But There Will Be No Immediate Impact

By SEMA Washington, D.C., Staff

A World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement panel ruled that U.S. tariffs imposed on $234 billion worth of goods from China violate WTO rules. However, the ruling will have no immediate impact on tariff collections by U.S. Customs.

Since 2018, the U.S. has imposed tariffs on the Chinese goods as the two countries negotiated trade agreements. The U.S. argued that China needed to strengthen its intellectual property protections and make other changes, and that tariffs are permitted if foreign commerce unfairly burdens the U.S.

Although the U.S. and China have negotiated a phase-one trade agreement, the tariffs remain largely intact. The WTO panel sided with a complaint filed by China that the tariffs violate several provisions of global trade rules, including a requirement that all WTO members offer equal tariff among trading partners.

Most auto part imports from China are subject to 25% tariffs. Some exclusions from the tariffs have been granted based on a demonstration that there was no other supply source and the company would suffer serious economic harm; however, the exclusions expired August 7, 2020, or will expire on December 31, 2020.

While the U.S. may appeal the WTO ruling that the tariffs are illegal, the U.S. has not filled vacant positions of the WTO Appellate Board, so the board is not addressing trade disputes. The Trump Administration believes the WTO needs to update its rules and make other structural reforms. The Administration has cited the WTO’s failure to sufficiently challenge China’s unfair trade practices to demonstrate a need for changes.

In summary, the U.S. tariffs on Chinese products will remain in place for the foreseeable future. Even if China were able to pursue the WTO ruling, it would probably be seeking permission to impose retaliatory tariffs.

For more information, contact Stuart Gosswein at stuartg@sema.org.

Rate this article: 
No votes yet